tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2734283773701136760.post4492468274064053805..comments2024-03-26T20:11:01.933-04:00Comments on NOT BLOG X: UXM #361& X-MEN #81 – November 1998G. Kendallhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12279461069684403792noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2734283773701136760.post-59808157971401854712009-06-01T11:52:22.677-04:002009-06-01T11:52:22.677-04:00Once again, a pair of issues from the Seagle/Kelly...Once again, a pair of issues from the Seagle/Kelly era that I have absolutely zero recollection of! For some reason, these guys must not have impressed me much...!Mattnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2734283773701136760.post-45488053289572652212009-05-30T09:54:00.187-04:002009-05-30T09:54:00.187-04:00Against my better judgment, I've always kind of li...Against my better judgment, I've always kind of liked both issues. <br />Althought I don't know if that's because I love the art so much in both. Because the group interactions were handled pretty well in both, at this point, I thought the new editorially-mandated Kelly/Seagle run could work.<br /><br />I don't think the hard-core fans were clamouring for a Gambit return. For me the 1997-98 year without him had been a really refreshing one, and I love the new group dynamics Kelly and Seagle had created.robnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2734283773701136760.post-29190788854274027172009-05-30T09:52:45.842-04:002009-05-30T09:52:45.842-04:00You have to wonder if Kali was a dropped plot by K...You have to wonder if Kali was a dropped plot by Kelly, or just another blunder by editorial. Did Seagle and Kelly know they were off the books by this pooint, and just going through the motions of what editorial was telling them, or was editorial just re-writing everything they were doing?wwk5dnoreply@blogger.com