Down for the Count!
Credits: Dan Jurgens (story and art), Rick Burchett (finishes), Willie Schubert (letterer), Gene D’Angelo (colorist)
Summary:
The Justice League follows Doomsday’s trail to Ohio, where they soon
confront him at an oil refinery. Meanwhile, Superman is interviewed by Cat Grant and her studio audience. During the Justice League’s fight,
Blue Beetle is nearly killed. When the news bulletin breaks inside
the television studio, Superman immediately flies to Ohio. He arrives
in time to save Booster Gold, who’s been thrown into the sky by
Doomsday.
Irrelevant Continuity:
- Doomsday is indirectly named this issue, as Booster Gold tells Superman “it’s like doomsday in here!” on the final page.
- The JLA of this era consists of Maxima, Booster Gold, Blue Beetle, Guy Gardner, Fire, Ice, and Bloodwynd. Superman is also listed as a member, and even the leader by Cat Grant (he rejects the title), which surprised me since I’ve always believed that the post-Crisis Superman didn’t join the JLA until the Grant Morrison relaunch.
- Blue Beetle feels he’s discovered Bloodwynd’s secret identity, but he’s beaten into unconsciousness as he’s about to blurt out the name. The story hints that Bloodwynd is actually the Martian Manhunter, but looking online, the story appears to be more complicated than that.
Mom, Apple Pie, etc…: Superman refuses to dignify a sexist remark about Fire’s looks made by a studio audience member.
Review:
I hope you enjoyed Doomsday killing wildlife and smashing up
semi-trucks in the last chapter, because that’s what you’re getting
here. The art does a lot to save the thin plot (Jurgens/Burchett’s rendition of the cloaked Doomsday is reminiscent of something Mike
Mignola would draw…those red goggles are creepy),
but it’s easy to imagine how much better this issue would’ve been if
it featured a Justice League team not comprised of second-stringers.
It’s amazing to me that DC ever thought there was a substantial
audience for a team like this, and that it took them so long to
actually give readers the Justice League they wanted to see. Jurgens
is able to introduce the team and their powers in such a concise manner
it would make Jim Shooter proud, and his Bloodwynd/Martian Manhunter
fake-out is a fun play on audience expectations, but the team has no
visible chemistry and there’s no obvious reason to care about any of
them.
The fight scenes are interrupted with quick clips of Superman being interviewed by one of his supporting cast members, which if nothing
else, serve as a reminder of his personality before his inevitable
death scene. Superman doesn’t want to badmouth any of his teammates,
even Guy Gardner, he agrees with a hippie audience member that
violence shouldn’t be the answer, and believes in treating ladies with
respect, thank-you-very-much. He also admits that he occasionally
fears his own death, in a bit of not obvious at all foreshadowing. The
interview segments do a decent job of straddling the line between
earnestness and corniness, and the bored reactions of some of the
audience members highlight one of the points the event’s trying to make
-- people are taking Superman for granted. Mike Carlin would later
cite this point in interviews justifying the decision to kill
Superman. I actually think it’s a legitimate avenue to explore, even
though this is one of the few occasions the storyline even touches on
the issue.
superman became a "face" of the jla, and an add-needed member in time of crisis after the events of "panic in the sky", but didn't become a full-time member as you mentioned, until the morrison years. :)
ReplyDeleteBurchett and Jurgens made a great art time. I liked their work more than the Jurgens artwork we got in the Superman title.
ReplyDeleteWith regards to the team of second stringers...most of them (Fire, Ice, Guy Gardner, Booster Gold, and Blue Beetle) were coasting by on the goodwill of the Giffen/De Mattis era...
Its interesting, but I prefer my teams to be composed of so-called "second-stringers." Frankly I'd rather see a team like this then six guys with their own books and one cipher (sorry J'onn!)
ReplyDeleteNot that you can't tell good JLA stories with the Big Seven (or good Avengers stories with the Big Three), but I like a team where anything can happen to the characters. Not just in big terms, the stereotypical 90's kill-'em-all thing, but character development.
If the team that went up against Doomsday in this storyline was the classic seven, is there any chance that Batman would have been beaten into a coma that lasted...months? Years?* Or would Green Lantern's ring have been broken, leading to years of him finding other technologies to get back in the game? Or would Wonder Woman have lost her powers for years?
Even if DC would try these storylines (and why not, they did try plenty of worse ones in the 90's...or 00's, or 10's), you KNOW that they wouldn't happen in their team book, because they had their own titles.
Its the same with character beats. Good writers can and do work around it, but clearly someone with their own book(s) isn't going to go through major personal issues in the team books.
All that to say, I absolutely loved the second-string JLA, JLE and JLI, and will still get in a knife-fight to defend the 90's Avengers titles (well, the Defalco-Epting main title and Roy Thomas West Coast run); its actually among my favourites. I know full well that part of this is because it was what was out when I got into comics, of course. But I get upset when people write of the era because characters had stubble and pouches and jackets. Right, because nothing good happened in Silver Age X-Men comics because they were silly, and Chris Claremont's excessive narration and dropped plotlines mean that his run is worthless too.
Wow! This became a heck of a rant, my apologies. None of this is directed at this G. Kendall or this post in particular. I love this blog, and even when I disagree with GK, his years of posting here more than prove that he's not writing the 90's off, or at least not without a heck of a lot of thought involved. Just wanted to make the point that, hey, I want to read JLA stories about the second-stringers!
*I honestly can't remember how long Blue Beetle's coma was. I know that Death of Superman happened while I was living outside of the country for three years as a kid, and Blue Beetle was back before I moved home, but I know it felt like quite a while.
Which is another thing (and now I'll sound like a crotchety old man), I miss the pace that comics maintained through the 90's. If BB was out of action for, say a year, that was probably 8 storylines. Now, that would be maybe 2. I've been re-reading my Essential X-Men collections, and am stunned at how much we've lost in terms of story-per-issue.
I absolutely recognize the importance of having second-stringers in a team book, for the reasons you cite. But an entire team of them sounds like a terrible idea to me. JLA was conceived as a showcase for the biggest DC stars, so going years at a time without any of them violates the basic premise, in my mind.
ReplyDeleteSuperman joined JLA when Jurgens took over from Giffen & DeMatteis with #61, and that membership run only lasted until his death.
ReplyDeleteG. Kendall:
ReplyDeleteI caught myself writing another rant, but scrapped it. I want to write that much, I should get my own blog! Anyway, I don't think there's such a thing as right or wrong on the issue (sales in the 90's said I was, sales now say you are).
Anyway, count me among those glad to see you covering this storyline. I can't remember if you said, but I hope you're covering the whole Funeral for a Friend, four Super-Men, etc.
I reread my trade when I read you were gonna tackle it, and I'm starting to reconsider it: I now reckon its' quite a read, a good saga, not just a "by-the-numbers let´s kill Supes" kinda thing
ReplyDeleteKabe
I always felt like the first two dozen or so issues of the post crisis jll reboot was great and the next few years up until Morrison were futile attempts to recapture that. An actual post crisis jla reboot in the vein of year one, man of steel or Perez wonder woman could have been great
ReplyDelete